Why most Chinese herbs education doesn’t work

As most of you know, I’m a little obsessed with Chinese herbs education.

I teach Chinese herbs at NCNM, and every year I learn something new.  It’s gotten to the point where I’m actually doing a lot of research into how teaching topics like this has been done in various times and places.  I’m also engaging in plenty of coursework myself to see how others are doing it in the here and now.

I want to draw a picture of how Chinese herbs are generally taught, while suggesting how the picture may be problematic

Let me note at the outset that there are many, many fine herbs teachers in the world.  Some of them even get to teach some of what they are passionate about.  But, the sad reality is that the licensing situation in the US, economic pressures and a lack of any real encouragement for teachers to pursue new vistas in their teaching create an unsavory situation for all of us.
We’ll use a favorite herb of mine as a case study – Chaihu 柴胡.  You might be interested to read some bits and pieces of my take on Chaihu in one of my latest blog posts.  I also did a little video about Chaihu, if you’ve not seen it – go give it a look.  It’s worth your time, I think.  When you’re done, come back and read this.  I can wait.

Chaihu as typically taught in a college course

Most Chinese herbs courses at colleges and universities are required to cover something in the neighborhood of 300 herbs during 2-3 academic terms.  That’s too many, by more than half.  This is probably the reason that the following information is about all the average student will get…

  • Name of the herb : Chaihu, bupleurum root

Strangely, many people do not learn the official scientific binomial name of the herb in question.  This causes real problems if the person seeks to do some additional research, say into biochemistry, personal propagation or even simply to learn more about it in the Chinese medicine texts.
Fortunately, Bensky does list the scientific name of the typical species, and a few other besides.  However, many people learn and remember one or another common names, which can cause confusion.

  • Category : pungent, cool herbs that release the exterior

I never, ever teach Chinese herbs by the categories set out in the standard Chinese herbal texts.  Why?  Because the vast majority of our best herbs do not fit easily into a single category.  When students and teachers are seeking to economize in their teaching and learning, they tend to remember the category, the name and not much else.
In the case of Chaihu – thinking of it as a pungent, cool herb that releases the exterior will NOT help you to understand the vast majority of classical formulas containing Chaihu.  These categories are intended to simplify learning, but in most cases, it just further confuses the issue.

  • Channel affinity : Gallbladder, Liver, Triple Burner and Pericardium.

Note that these are usually represented by their shortened forms (GB, LR, TB, PC) and almost never are interesting relationships pointed out (Shaoyang and Jueyin).  While one could argue that one is supposed to know this, the fact is that most first year herb students either don’t know enough yet or are never taught to note these relationships.
While I don’t agree that this kind of shorthand is actually helpful, it’s made even less so by the poor state of patho-physiological education in most Chinese medicine institutions.  (That’s why we’re teaching courses like the Essentials course on the Six Conformations).  When a student finds out that an herb “enters the Triple Burner” what on EARTH can this possibly mean to them?  How should they use this information in clinic?

  • Flavor / Nature : Pungent, bitter and cool

Though most books and websites that list this information do so prominently, few teachers emphasize it and even fewer require memorization of the information.  Apart from that, there is almost no effort made to discuss what these concepts actually mean, the historical development of those concepts and disagreement about the flavor and nature of herbs through time.

Though a nuanced discussion of these issues would take a class all by itself, even a simple mention of the flavor in our foundational text – the Shennong bencao jing – would seem to be a simple addition to any class.

  • Herb Actions

Herb actions are essentially short-hand for the most important things an herb does in the human body.  The Clif Notes version.  The sad part is that most of these are memorized as a list, and the larger theory about when and why these things happen is usually not addressed.  Further, this takes students far, far off the path of holistic understanding.  If you begin to think about herbs in terms of “actions” you are typically banished to “symptom” thinking.

At this point, the herb has the character of something like the shell of a new building.

A few walls, a ceiling, a floor.  Straight lines, an open box.  This can be ok – it’s open, it’s ready to be filled, it’s fairly simplistic.  In fact, from the perspective of many teachers and long-time practitioners, the information seems insanely simplistic.  So, it must be easy for students – right?
Wrong.  The reality is that this simple, bland structure often reaps more confusion – and given the sometimes deadpan delivery andpressure of testing – it can be too much to take.  Students drop out, do poorly, or zombie walk their way through.  Some enterprising individuals manage to fill the empty walls with color, to find sources of information that energize them.  Others come with pre-existing knowledge that keeps them inspired – they are excited no matter what they’re learning!

I created the Shennong Relational Herb Learning Method to share the way one enterprising young student (myself) solved the problem of loss of inspiration and interest in Chinese herbs.  Many who have gone through the course have enjoyed it, and people jump on board with the course to this day.

But, it’s not enough.


In that class, I talk about the method.  I talk about the HOW of learning Chinese herbs.  That works for some people, but not everyone.  Further, in my teaching of that course, I’ve learned new things and refined my own understanding of some particular herbs.  People both on and off the site have asked me to share this information, too.

I’m going to be doing just that…

Offering a single herbs course isn’t something that sounds very exciting.  Especially if you’ve already been through a university/college course in the topic, you might break out in hives at the mere mention!  But, I have a real passion for this – and I think I’d like to offer an online course about Chinese herbs that avoids all the deficiencies above, excites people about what they are learning, and puts the tools for actually applying this knowledge to real patient problems in their hands.

I’ll combine short, engaging lectures that cover sensory information, the best of Western science, visual aids, classical texts, clinical cases, botanical and ecological tidbits, exercises that appeal to a variety of learning styles, and interactive community building in a very reasonably priced package.

We’re going to do it differently – one herb clan at a time

I’ll build each modular course around a single herb family – a series of related herbs that work well together.  That way, students will be learning the basics of what they need to know to learn formulas.  People who already KNOW formulas will have a leg up and find that the single herbs blossom in their understanding as they understand further complexities.

If you want to learn some more details and get signed up – just click this link!



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About Eric Grey

Hi - I'm the founder of Deepest Health. When I'm not writing here, you can find me reaching out to the Chinese Medicine community across the web and in my own backyard. I currently teach Chinese herbs at my alma mater, the National College of Natural Medicine. Additionally, I'm the founder of Watershed Community Wellness, a thriving local clinic in Southeast Portland in Oregon. No matter where I'm working, you'll find my focus on the Classical approach to Chinese medicine laced throughout everything I do.

View all posts by Eric Grey - Website: http://deepesthealth.com

10/06/2012

Great work, Eric. I took a semester of herbs and decided to wait until after I graduated to continue. I graduated 5 years ago and still haven’t returned to herbal studies. I am a western herbalist and what I found missing was any connection to the PLANT – the herb was a dead thing in a plastic container. Even the teacher didn’t know where the plant grew – its terrain, the soil, what it looked like when it was a real plant. Paraclesus wrote about the Doctrine of signatures – what the plant looks like can deteremine its usage. Studying a plant is fascinating; studying a dead sample in plastic …. not very. Would that be included in your work? The rest of the ideas you mentioned make herbal studies sound fascinating.

Reply
Eric Grey says:
10/06/2012

Therese,

Yes, yes, yes. A connection to the living plant, to me, is crucial. Now, sometimes it’s tough to find that information, and obviously one cannot demand that students grow herbs (different living situations, different lives) but talking about how the plant grows, to what other plants it is related, and even just showing the plant growing … all of these are critical. It’s what I teach at NCNM, and it’s the core of the Shennong method I’ve taught here at DH for a while.

That’s one of the key things I learned from Western herbalists – with whom I have a lot of contact at NCNM!

Thanks for your comment!

Reply
Rachel Pargeter says:
11/02/2012

Eric, I appreciate this post immensely as a pre-naturopathy student trying to decide how far down the Chinese Medicine rabbit hole I want to travel.

I have to credit Jim Cleaver’s Qigong demonstration during one of NCNM’s Exploration days as a clear expansion of my awarness of what the practice of healing really entails.

He has thus catalyzed my subsequent exploration of Chinese Medicine. Now I can geek out over Heiner and Lauries’ True Nature Radio show, and hope for more appearances from Roger Batchelor and David Ford.

I’ve been volunteering at a community acupuncture clinic and shadowing a Naturopath/Acupuncturist to get more of a feel for what happens in a clinical setting.

As of yet I am excited to learn the Chinese philosophy behind the way herbs interact with the mind, body,and spirit of the patient. I feel it is a necsessary part of the tool box for a more compleate treatment stratagy.

On the other hand,from what I have been told students taking the herbs portion of the dual degree program at other schools did not enjoy that portion of their education, and found it to be exceedingly stressful and disengaging.

I have been having a difficult time deciding which of the dual degree programs to pursue at NCNM. I feel the depth of the MSOM degree provides the strong knowledge base I am looking for, but I am worried about the extra time and money being spent on something I could lose interest in because of the way it is taught.

I feel this course model you are talking about would greatly enhance the learning and retention of the material and get students excited and passionate again. If we are paying such a large amount of money for graduate school we should be in a learning environment that fosters that excitement.

Terese brought up valid points in addition to yours. Learning tools involving live examples of particular herbs where possible. The potential healing energy seems to be more apparent when the plant is in such a vibrant state as opposed being dead and unreachable in a lifeless plastic barrier. Having information about an herb’s ideal growing terrain is a vital piece of information to have, as much of the herb’s efficacy is dependent on how and where it was harvested. The Doctrine of Signatures would also be a wonderful addition to the course where possible, as it further fosters our connection to how nature influenced the use of the herb.

Thank you for the insightful post and funny videos!

Reply
Eric Grey says:
11/02/2012

Rachel,

Thank you so much for your fine comment. I agree with everything you’ve said, and have to tell you that you’re not alone in your explorations and feelings around these matters. I teach this material, of course, in the Herbs Lab course at NCNM. So folks who have the opportunity to study at NCNM get all of this as part of that course. I don’t teach the method so explicitly, but we explore, explore and explore some more. Most students, I think, enjoy it.

Between that and the ability to study formulas with Heiner, I think the MSOM program is a worthy investment. But, I’m biased. ;)

Thanks again,

Eric

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>